Abstract: In current article the results of performance analysis of St. Petersburg Mining University academic stuff and the methodology of risk assessment of the activities of structural departments in priority direction of university's development are considered. Based on the results of the lecturer's performance assessment ratings of the departments for each indicator of activity and overall rating of the departments were assembled. Moreover, in current article, it is represented that type of the department does not affect the place of the department in the general rating scheme, consequently, it is possible to conduct evaluation regardless of the department type. Comparison of the results with the last year ratings demonstrated that position of department in overall rating scheme and perception of its place in particular risk zone influence positively (motivate) on the head of the academic stuff aspiration to improve their positions in the overall ranking and break out into the leaders, thereby increasing quality of their work.
Keywords: university, risk, teaching staff, department-indicators, management
Recieved: 30.09.2017 Accepted: 21.04.2018 UDC: 005.331/332